tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-53215010601258368662024-03-13T11:07:18.360-04:00Schmitty's SoapboxJudge, jury and executioner of music and movies.Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.comBlogger69125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-27621629861900874962013-11-01T01:46:00.003-04:002013-11-01T01:46:34.055-04:00Theater Interruption (Prisoners / Gravity)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpXfcTF6iVk" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Prisoners </span>(2013)</a></i></b><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zMMWddH14zk/UnM-ott15FI/AAAAAAAAAcQ/h5bL7Bv5o1E/s1600/Prisoners.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zMMWddH14zk/UnM-ott15FI/AAAAAAAAAcQ/h5bL7Bv5o1E/s320/Prisoners.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Denis Villeneuve</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: Aaron Guzikowski</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Viola Davis</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
"Prisoners" managed to hit a sweet spot for me that very few mystery stories accomplish. The film drops enough hints about the true nature of events that the reveals make complete sense when they happen without being too obvious early on. The acting is great all around and the atmosphere is suitably bleak through Deakins' lens. A tense experience that also manages some ethical questions. Is there such a thing as too far when it comes to trying to save your child's life? Is that line crossed here?</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 8 / 10</i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4pcg7bXgmU" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Gravity </span>(2013)</a></i></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tjN6fxLYjWw/UnM-tT1WBII/AAAAAAAAAcY/_kpoMMDIA-E/s1600/Gravity.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-tjN6fxLYjWw/UnM-tT1WBII/AAAAAAAAAcY/_kpoMMDIA-E/s320/Gravity.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Alfonso Cuarón</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Alfonso Cuarón and Jonás Cuarón</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Sandra Bullock, George Clooney, Ed Harris</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
"Gravity" is like many other blockbusters in several respects. It is light on story, simplistic in its characterizations and fairly predictable in plot. However, it is head and shoulders above any other (non-Nolan) blockbuster in terms of execution for the better part of a decade. It is a feat of technical wizardry, an absolute masterclass in camera choreography and perfectly controlled tension - easily one of the most thrilling theater experiences that I have ever had. I'm not usually the one white-knuckled in the theater, but here... I don't often advocate for inflated ticket prices, but if you can still see it in IMAX 3D, do so.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b></div>
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-38175717542684749322013-09-12T22:02:00.000-04:002013-09-12T22:02:00.906-04:00Theater Interruption (The World's End / Elysium)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFo7eJR2cvc" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The World's End </span>(2013)</a></i></b><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Dxcn9vkaP8I/UjJv2_NnBbI/AAAAAAAAAbs/e-_JucEk9jU/s1600/World's+End,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Dxcn9vkaP8I/UjJv2_NnBbI/AAAAAAAAAbs/e-_JucEk9jU/s320/World's+End,+The.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Edgar Wright</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Simon Pegg, Edgar Wright</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, Martin Freeman</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
Wright, Pegg and Frost somehow find a way to bring their loose "trilogy" to a satisfying conclusion. <i>The World's End</i>, while sporting some obvious inspirations, isn't nearly as focused on referential comedy and parodies as <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> and <i>Hot Fuzz</i> were. This film is much more focused on its characters and the process of "moving on," while still being extremely funny in its own right. Some might get mood whiplash from the transitions between drama and comedy, but I feel it works for the most part. I've always liked Simon Pegg, but I feel that this is by far his best character and overall performance. One pleasant surprise was how awesome the fights were - it's partially a condemnation of current films and partially a compliment to this movie's crew, but Nick Frost's brawl scenes are some of the most fun fight sequences in recent memory. Seriously great.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 8 / 10</i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIBtePb-dGY" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Elysium </span>(2013)</a></i></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GSEchaVyepk/UjJwAJ4tR9I/AAAAAAAAAb0/kT-LoGE9zLs/s1600/Elysium.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GSEchaVyepk/UjJwAJ4tR9I/AAAAAAAAAb0/kT-LoGE9zLs/s320/Elysium.jpg" width="198" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Neill Blomkamp</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: Neill Blomkamp</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Matt Damon, Jodie Foster, Sharlto Copley</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
The trailers promised a sci-fi film that would explore (in a one-sided sense) the timely topics of social classes, immigration, and healthcare. What was delivered was an action film with flimsy cardboard cutouts of these issues as backdrops. The story is generic, the characters are (generally) very archetypal, and the dialogue is occasionally cringe-worthy with several very awkward exposition sequences. But that fairly rickety framework is just barely enough to carry an otherwise very cool production. Blomkamp goes a touch overboard with shaky-cam in a couple of sequences, but otherwise shows a really sharp eye for this kind of film. The production design is absolutely fantastic and of particular note is the sound design, which gives a lot of weight and authenticity to the action. Most of the acting is just passable, with two exceptions to either extreme: Copley to the awesome-scenery-chewing end and Foster to the what-the-hell-was-that-hot-garbage end.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b></div>
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-3015975712182332002013-08-28T23:08:00.001-04:002013-08-28T23:08:38.319-04:00Theater Interruption (Kick-Ass 2 / You're Next)Welcome to the newest installment in our "Summer of... Meh" series.<br />
<b><i><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UMbwxbgv8U" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Kick-Ass 2 </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dMGm3wc84Y4/Uh65fqaafhI/AAAAAAAAAbQ/k9643qk8c2E/s1600/Kick-Ass+2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dMGm3wc84Y4/Uh65fqaafhI/AAAAAAAAAbQ/k9643qk8c2E/s320/Kick-Ass+2.png" width="206" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Jeff Wadlow</i><br />
<i>Writers: Jeff Wadlow (screenplay), Mark Millar and John Romita Jr. (comic book)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Chloë Grace Moretz, Christopher Mintz-Plasse</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
It is not as good as the sequel I had hoped for, but not nearly as bad as the one that I expected, either. There's a pretty decent amount of delicious over-the-top comedy and violence on display, but it is also missing a couple key ingredients that elevated the original (at least a bit). First, you never realize how much you like Nicholas Cage until he is not there anymore. His Big Daddy character was great and far better than the kinda-sorta replacement, Colonel Stars and Stripes, as (under)played by Jim Carrey. Second, the comedy is more scattershot and less satirical than what was featured in the first. The voice-over narration from Kick-Ass was noticeably lacking in this installment as well. Not bad, but not particularly interesting.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufUQWpEkbf0" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">You're Next </span>(2011)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zPTFKfdkHbw/Uh65lBH-JpI/AAAAAAAAAbY/KmNQ0dUO5K4/s1600/You're+Next.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zPTFKfdkHbw/Uh65lBH-JpI/AAAAAAAAAbY/KmNQ0dUO5K4/s320/You're+Next.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<br />
<i>Director: Adam Wingard</i><br />
<i>Writer: Simon Barrett</i><br />
<i>Stars: Sharni Vinson, Joe Swanberg, AJ Bowen</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
This one's apparently been sitting on the shelf for a while waiting for a distributor - which is weird, considering the dearth of interesting horror for the past couple of years. Of course, the fact that it is as much a black comedy as it is a straight horror flick could have something to do with that. Wingard and Barrett know their slasher tropes and want to make sure you realize just how clever and subversive they're being in one scene before completely changing course and playing everything completely straight in the next. This results in the movie tripping over itself quite a bit while it tries to play hopscotch between black comedy and horror, but there were still enough laughs and extreme kills that I enjoyed myself throughout. It is nice to have certain clichés turned on their head for once, but it seems like the creators find this far cleverer than it actually is in practice.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-6740260863820875292013-08-14T19:55:00.001-04:002013-08-14T19:55:57.982-04:00Episode Twelve-Point-Five (The Asphalt Jungle / The Wolverine)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwZ82gM0S3k" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The Asphalt Jungle </span>(1950)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Ikg8V6t5xp0/UgwXM9A22CI/AAAAAAAAAa0/uNPHAkKOCgU/s1600/Asphalt+Jungle,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Ikg8V6t5xp0/UgwXM9A22CI/AAAAAAAAAa0/uNPHAkKOCgU/s320/Asphalt+Jungle,+The.jpg" width="212" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: John Huston</i><br />
<i>Writers: Ben Maddow and John Huston (screenplay), W.R. Burnett (novel)</i><br />
<i>Stars: Sterling Hayden, Louis Calhern, Jean Hagen</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
A classic heist film that is less interested in the heist itself and more interested in the characters involved. Fortunately, the characters are mostly interesting and far more three-dimensional than most cardboard cutouts you'd find in other caper films. Sam Jaffe is the highlight in an overall solid cast as the criminal mastermind. If there is a true weak link in this film, it is Jean Hagen's character who comes across as clingy and fairly annoying. Great atmosphere and quite tense at times, featuring excellent noir aesthetics.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 7 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th1NTVIhUQU" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The Wolverine </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JPENksFkz_A/UgwXRjpX89I/AAAAAAAAAa8/fQsIMgwEAfc/s1600/Wolverine,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-JPENksFkz_A/UgwXRjpX89I/AAAAAAAAAa8/fQsIMgwEAfc/s320/Wolverine,+The.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: James Mangold</i><br />
<i>Writers: Mark Bomback and Scott Frank (screenplay)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Hugh Jackman, Tao Okamoto, Rila Fukushima</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
If there is one thing that <i>The Wolverine</i> absolutely nails, it is the characterization of the title character. The film does a great job of fleshing out Logan's struggles with his immortality and the fact that he had to kill the woman he loved - Jackman is great, as always. The film also nails the action scene on top of the bullet train; it is exciting, unique and has some funny moments. Outside of these aspects, things are kind of a mess. The villains are some of the weakest I've seen and, while the Japanese setting is pleasing, the plot itself is mediocre at best. Very middle of the road overall, but a giant leap forward from <i>Origins</i>.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Side notes: <b>1)</b> I still want to know how Aronofsky's R-rated Wolverine movie would have turned out and <b>2)</b> I feel like I should award a bonus point for how damn awesome that poster is... </i><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-58917778834250919192013-07-24T22:56:00.001-04:002013-07-24T22:56:15.965-04:00Theater Interruption (Pacific Rim / The Conjuring)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5guMumPFBag" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Pacific Rim </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S6t5ZcGXHVQ/UfCRgeE7TmI/AAAAAAAAAaU/sZpJ9RM7G5E/s1600/Pacific+Rim.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-S6t5ZcGXHVQ/UfCRgeE7TmI/AAAAAAAAAaU/sZpJ9RM7G5E/s320/Pacific+Rim.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Guillermo del Toro</i><br />
<i>Writers: Travis Beacham (story and screenplay), and Guillermo del Toro (screenplay)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Charlie Hunnam, Idris Elba, Rinko Kikuchi</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
It would be easy to call Pacific Rim a dumb, over-the-top action movie on the same level as the Transformers series. But to brush it off so simply would be to ignore the fact that there is a difference between "simple characterization" and "lazy characterization," between "silly" and "stupid," between "embracing your inner child" and "being immature." Guillermo del Toro obviously knows the difference and realizes that just because you are playing with major archetypes doesn't mean you can ignore the details. Sure, the movie is big, loud and cheesy - but it is also obvious that a lot of time has been spent crafting these characters and creatures and del Toro had just as much fun making the film as anybody is having while watching.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 6 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb-jRz7HWqs" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The Conjuring </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8o3Rev7bHN0/UfCRle_68fI/AAAAAAAAAac/EACpj0LOWCU/s1600/Conjuring,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8o3Rev7bHN0/UfCRle_68fI/AAAAAAAAAac/EACpj0LOWCU/s320/Conjuring,+The.jpg" width="229" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: James Wan</i><br />
<i>Writers: Chad Hayes and Carey Hayes (screenplay)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Vera Farmiga, Patrick Wilson, Lili Taylor</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
Watching "The Conjuring" is almost depressing; on its own merits it is slightly above average, but the fact that 99% of horror that has come out in the past few years is truly bad makes it look like a masterpiece in comparison. It plays out exactly like you would expect a haunted house / exorcism mash-up would. But while it does nothing new, it hits almost every beat very well, flawlessly combining atmosphere and jump scares. Wan is very good about using misdirection in order to keep the scares fresh and seems to have an excellent sense of just how long he can draw out a tense moment before reaching the breaking point. Highly derivative but well executed with only a couple moments of unintended silliness (usually a major problem for me with horror).<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-74973260357559964702013-07-10T21:27:00.000-04:002013-07-24T22:26:25.435-04:00Theater Interruption (Mud / Despicable Me 2)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFBC8ohhVUs" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Mud </span>(2012)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2dMm6_NAn88/Ud4HO-aQhKI/AAAAAAAAAZ4/_Dt2ubogv9Y/s1600/Mud.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2dMm6_NAn88/Ud4HO-aQhKI/AAAAAAAAAZ4/_Dt2ubogv9Y/s320/Mud.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Jeff Nichols</i><br />
<i>Writer: Jeff Nichols</i><br />
<i>Stars: Matthew McConaughey, Tye Sheridan, Jacob Lofland</i><i></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
A modern day Huckleberry Finn displayed through a mild Southern Gothic filter. Nichols seems to love this setting, beautifully photographing life on the river, warts and all. The story is a simple enough fable and generally doesn't feel too heavy-handed in its coming-of-age messages, though I don't feel like the ending works quite as well as the earlier material, tending to be a bit too over-the-top. I also wouldn't argue against a bit of trimming, as the middle section does start to drag a bit. However, the performances from the kids are surprisingly good and McConaughey continues his hot streak with a role that I wouldn't be surprised to see earn him an Oscar nod.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 7 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwXbtZXjbVE" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Despicable Me 2 </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9iYZpw9o5hQ/Ud4H6TveqnI/AAAAAAAAAaA/OjVzelwlD2U/s1600/Despicable+Me+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9iYZpw9o5hQ/Ud4H6TveqnI/AAAAAAAAAaA/OjVzelwlD2U/s320/Despicable+Me+2.jpg" width="202" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Directors: Pierre Coffin, Chris Renaud</i><br />
<i>Writers: Ken Daurio and Cinco Paul</i><br />
<i>Stars: Steve Carell, Kristen Wiig, Benjamin Bratt</i><i></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
I'm of two minds with this movie. On the one hand, this is probably a bit funnier than the first one based purely on a LPM (laughs per minute) metric. On the other hand, the thing that made <i>Despicable Me</i> stand out from the crowd was the villain-as-protagonist angle. By making Gru into a purely good family man, they've stripped the franchise of its best attribute and distilled it down to simple, silly fun. Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with that (and I'm sure the kids won't care), but it surely will generate a bit less interest for the adults. Solid, funny, vanilla family entertainment.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-51687012445046982422013-06-26T19:17:00.002-04:002013-07-24T22:26:07.190-04:00Episode Twelve (Adaptation. / Arsenic and Old Lace)Yes, I'm aware that <i>Adaptation. </i>was in the wrong spot on my shelf. It's fixed now. Can we let it go? Good.<br />
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMwOEkTmTyQ" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Adaptation. </span>(2002)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5ies3aRNzgE/UctxuxXiv1I/AAAAAAAAAZY/Vvu9birGLHc/s1600/Adaptation.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5ies3aRNzgE/UctxuxXiv1I/AAAAAAAAAZY/Vvu9birGLHc/s320/Adaptation.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Spike Jonze</i><br />
<i>Writers: Susan Orlean (book), Charlie Kaufman and Donald Kaufman (screenplay)</i><br />
<i>Stars: Nicolas Cage, Chris Cooper, Meryl Streep</i><i></i><br />
<i><br /></i>
For me, this film perfectly represents the <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FridgeBrilliance" target="_blank">"fridge brilliance"</a> trope. At the end of my first viewing, I was left disappointed and confused by the bizarre turn the film takes in its final act. It wasn't until I was reflecting on the film a couple hours afterwards that all of the pieces clicked into place and I was able to see clearly through the thick haze of meta. Once that happened and I realized that the great performances were, in fact, in service of a very clever script I was able to confirm that I loved the film. Having trouble adapting a novel to the screen? Why not write about yourself having trouble writing about it? Then create an imaginary sibling to help you co-write this screenplay about your inability to write a screen adaptation of the novel. Easy peasy.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCWBDwkhGN0" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Arsenic and Old Lace </span>(1944)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6Br8x657iYg/UctzaI0LEVI/AAAAAAAAAZo/i6QhUYT9eHM/s1600/Arsenic+and+Old+Lace.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6Br8x657iYg/UctzaI0LEVI/AAAAAAAAAZo/i6QhUYT9eHM/s320/Arsenic+and+Old+Lace.jpg" width="212" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Frank Capra</i><br />
<i>Writers: Julius J. Epstein and Philip G. Epstein (screenplay), and Joseph Kesselring (stage play)</i><br />
<i>Stars: Cary Grant, Priscilla Lane, Raymond Massey</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
Concurrently holds the top spots among my favorite screwball and black comedies. A light-hearted farce about serial killers featuring a great cast hamming it up for the camera. I know that Grant regarded this as his worst performance, but I don't think such a ludicrous story called for subtlety on his part and I consider it one of his most enjoyable roles. For that matter, it is probably also my favorite performance from Peter Lorre as Dr. Einstein. For me, most comedies wear thin after repeated viewings - this is one of the very few that I can watch over and over again and laugh every time. The only nitpick I have about the movie is that I would have loved to have seen Karloff recreate the role he played on stage. Other than that minor point this movie is perfect to my eyes, ears and funny bone.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 10 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-90935535266290685452013-06-19T18:32:00.001-04:002013-06-19T18:32:30.818-04:00Theater Interruption (Man of Steel / Frances Ha)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6DJcgm3wNY" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Man of Steel </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nYc9lWs1x5A/UcIui-xkK0I/AAAAAAAAAY0/K4vWyJQ7cJk/s1600/Man+of+Steel.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nYc9lWs1x5A/UcIui-xkK0I/AAAAAAAAAY0/K4vWyJQ7cJk/s320/Man+of+Steel.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Zack Snyder</i><br />
<i>Writers: David S. Goyer (story and screenplay), Christopher Nolan (story), Jerry Siegel and </i><i>Joe Shuster (Superman character)</i><br />
<i>Stars: Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Michael Shannon</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
This incarnation of Superman has some very good things going for it - specifically, Snyder's great eye for action and the wonderful cast (Cavill, Shannon and Costner are absolutely perfect). Unfortunately, it has two glaring weaknesses - specifically, Snyder's complete lack of subtlety and Goyer's weak writing. Every positive is accompanied by a negative and the net result ends up being absolutely average by Hollywood blockbuster standards. The eye-candy action is counterbalanced by glacial pacing. The few great character moments are outweighed by the scenes that Goyer thinks will hit you in the emotions like a truck, but instead have you rolling your eyes. For my money this is the best Superman movie to date, but that bar was very low.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBn5dgXFMis" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Frances Ha </span>(2012)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Yzx7gH0HLdQ/UcIv1VojbNI/AAAAAAAAAZE/xSY7q_4b0QU/s1600/Frances+Ha.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Yzx7gH0HLdQ/UcIv1VojbNI/AAAAAAAAAZE/xSY7q_4b0QU/s320/Frances+Ha.jpg" width="204" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Noah Baumbach</i><br />
<i>Writers: Noah Baumbach and Greta Gerwig (screenplay)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Greta Gerwig, Mickey Sumner, Adam Driver</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
Frances, the titular character, is a (mostly) likable, quirky and charming character - an aimless 27-year-old whose dream job as a dancer isn't going to work out, whose roommate/best friend is moving out, and who just generally needs to get her shit together. So, for an hour and a half, we watch her come to terms with these facts and, in the end, begin to get her shit together. Along the way, she has (mostly) uninteresting conversations with her (mostly) uninteresting and unlikable friends. If it is meant to criticize Frances' generation, the script is lacking teeth. If it is meant to be a comedy, it is lacking humor. What we're left with is a formless film - a good character given nothing to do.<br />
<i><br /></i>
<i><b>Score: 4 / 10</b></i>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-12443852988611474502013-06-12T18:50:00.002-04:002013-06-21T10:48:20.030-04:00Episode Eleven (Annie Hall / Apocalypse Now)Good god, it has been two months since I watched something off of my shelf? Far too long. Fortunately, it's two goodies.<br />
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBzHphcc2Jw" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Annie Hall </span>(1977)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yekX3ChVG-Q/Ubj3TTnBEuI/AAAAAAAAAYY/W6B1NF3EbKM/s1600/Annie+Hall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-yekX3ChVG-Q/Ubj3TTnBEuI/AAAAAAAAAYY/W6B1NF3EbKM/s320/Annie+Hall.jpg" height="320" width="214" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b><i>Director: Woody Allen</i><br />
<i>Writers: Woody Allen, Marshall Brickman</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Woody Allen, Diane Keaton, Tony Roberts</i><br />
<i><br /></i>A simple, genuine and touching story looking at love and relationships. The dialogue is great, as is the chemistry between Allen and Keaton. Allen is his typical neurotic self in this, but Alvy Singer feels like a much more fleshed-out character than simply Woody Allen "playing himself." What really sets this movie apart is the number of creative methods that Allen utilizes to tell his story: fourth-wall-breaking asides, animated sequences, split screen, subtitles showing us the characters' thoughts, kids speaking as their adult selves, etc. An absolute classic that codified a lot of genre standards and set an incredibly high bar for quality in romantic comedy.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt0xxAMTp8M" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Apocalypse Now </span>(1979)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a0ElkdscuUs/Ubj3YJjnfbI/AAAAAAAAAYg/jf5L4wrB5kA/s1600/Apocalypse+Now.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-a0ElkdscuUs/Ubj3YJjnfbI/AAAAAAAAAYg/jf5L4wrB5kA/s320/Apocalypse+Now.jpg" height="320" width="206" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b><i>Director: Francis Ford Coppola</i><br />
<i>Writers: John Milius and Francis Ford Coppola (screenplay), Michael Herr (narration), and Joseph Conrad (novel "Heart of Darkness")</i><br />
<div>
<i>Stars: Marlon Brando, Martin Sheen, Robert Duvall</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
Among the all time great films in its ability to evoke an incredibly strong mood and atmosphere throughout. This is achieved through some amazing performances (especially Duvall and Hopper) and great cinematography, but perhaps most notably in its impeccable use of music and sound. An intense and insane experience throughout, which only becomes more and more surreal and nightmarish as we travel deeper into the jungle. An oppressive, haunting film - a must-watch. "Drop the bomb. Exterminate them all."</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b></div>
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-86693658130744099752013-06-05T18:42:00.000-04:002013-06-05T18:42:00.726-04:00Theater Interruption (Now You See Me)<strong><em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzJNYYkkhzc" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Now You See Me </span><span style="font-size: small;">(2013)</span></a></em></strong><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mJNxgdsIfKg/Ua--gwpW68I/AAAAAAAAAYI/qdReFclixrY/s1600/Now+You+See+Me.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mJNxgdsIfKg/Ua--gwpW68I/AAAAAAAAAYI/qdReFclixrY/s1600/Now+You+See+Me.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="txt-block" itemprop="director" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
<em>Director: Louis Leterrier <br />Writers: Ed Solomon (screenplay), Boaz Yakin (screenplay), and Edward Ricourt (screenplay)</em></div>
<div class="txt-block" itemprop="director" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
<em>Stars: Jesse Eisenberg, Mark Ruffalo, Woody Harrelson</em></div>
<div class="txt-block" itemprop="director" itemscope="" itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
</div>
Starts off promisingly enough with the introduction of the group of tricksters soon to be known as the "Four Horsemen" embarking on the intriguing plot of using magic as a cover for committing actual crimes. The magicians are fun to watch in action, with the highlight being the antagonistic relationship between Woody Harrelson's conniving mentalist and Jesse Eisenberg's arrogant street magician. However, the script violates some of the cardinal rules of storytelling by keeping its most interesting characters (the Horsemen) off screen most of the time and leaning less on true misdirection in favor of lying to the audience. This results in weak character development and manages to sap a lot of fun out of the mystery and reveal. Competently made otherwise, it is a shame that such a great cast and premise were wasted on such a sloppy script.<br />
<br />
<strong><em>Score: 4 / 10</em></strong>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-39209512965602091132013-05-29T20:18:00.001-04:002013-05-29T20:18:21.716-04:00Theater Interruption (Star Trek Into Darkness / Epic)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyck3fFDK-s" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Star Trek Into Darkness </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GLOcr7VKJQs/UaaVXOz240I/AAAAAAAAAXw/Y_fn_hh71Eg/s1600/Star+Trek+Into+Darkness.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GLOcr7VKJQs/UaaVXOz240I/AAAAAAAAAXw/Y_fn_hh71Eg/s320/Star+Trek+Into+Darkness.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: J.J. Abrams</i><br />
<i>Writers: Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, </i><i>Damon Lindelof (screenplay), and </i><i>Gene Roddenberry (original series)</i><br />
<i></i><br />
<i>Stars: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
Abrams is a very good action director and the movie keeps up a breakneck pace throughout most of its running time. Sometimes it feels like things are moving too quickly; however, it isn't until after the film ends that you realize it absolutely needed to move that fast. The reason being, if the film had slowed down even for a moment we might have had a chance to realize that the script is consistently incredibly stupid. Character motivations are nonsensical, character arcs are repeats of the 2009 film, the plot is ridiculously contrived and the film belongs to that wonderful breed of science fiction that gets anything even vaguely science-related wrong. As an amusement park ride, it works - if you try to hold it up to any kind of scrutiny, it falls apart. All that being said, the strong performances, excellent production values and brisk pacing cover most of the holes and keep things fun and entertaining while watching.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><a href="http://www.blogger.com/"><span style="font-size: large;"><span id="goog_781883364"></span>Epic </span>(2013)<span id="goog_781883365"></span></a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NdtRdqGC5Xw/UaaVbeD1tNI/AAAAAAAAAX4/PBU3J9xk6Ok/s1600/Epic.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NdtRdqGC5Xw/UaaVbeD1tNI/AAAAAAAAAX4/PBU3J9xk6Ok/s320/Epic.jpg" width="217" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i>Director: Chris Wedge</i><br />
<i>Writers: </i><i>James V. Hart, </i><i>William Joyce (original story), </i><i>Daniel Shere, </i><i>Tom J. Astle, </i><i>Matt Ember, and </i><i>Chris Wedge<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span> <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span></i><br />
<i>Stars: Colin Farrell, Josh Hutcherson, Beyoncé Knowles</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
There's a lot of trope boxes being checked off here: the story is yet another slight twist on <i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccURwir7C_o" target="_blank">FernGully</a></i>, the characters are bog standard, the plot goes exactly where you expect it to, the comic relief side characters are appropriately zany, characters are voiced by (awkwardly cast) random celebrities, etc. Basically, it is exactly what you should expect from a middle-of-the-road kids' animated movie. On the plus side: the movie is gorgeous, the dog is amusing and Waltz plays a solid villain. Not much more to say, really.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 4 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-87876773846499629372013-05-15T19:23:00.000-04:002013-05-15T19:23:12.204-04:00Theater Interruption (The Great Gatsby)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuQhprtLJ3k" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The Great Gatsby </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aawgUExCryU/UZQXX6H0T1I/AAAAAAAAAXg/VP7LN0L5GhA/s1600/Great+Gatsby,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aawgUExCryU/UZQXX6H0T1I/AAAAAAAAAXg/VP7LN0L5GhA/s320/Great+Gatsby,+The.jpg" width="213" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Baz Luhrmann</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Baz Luhrmann (screenplay), Craig Pearce (screenplay) and F. Scott Fitzgerald (novel)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Leonardo DiCaprio, Joel Edgerton, Tobey Maguire</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
A very faithful adaptation for the most part, with the only major change coming in the addition of a mediocre framing device of a depressed and alcoholic Nick writing the story as part of his therapy. Overall, it doesn't detract too much and it offers a tolerable excuse to directly quote from the novel's text in voiceover. The visuals are the standard Luhrmann affair, totally gaudy and excessive - though I have to say that I felt they fit pretty well will the phony, showy and shallow lives of the characters. Baz directs the picture with all of the subtlety of a music video, but the source material isn't the most subtle anyway. While I found the modern soundtrack a bit jarring at first, I adjusted to the idea and it seemed to fit the mood well enough - there's a couple of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSPOCVjla_4" target="_blank">great songs</a> in there, especially <b><i><u><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Te11UaHOHMQ" target="_blank">this early front runner for Best Original Song</a>.</u></i></b> DiCaprio is a perfect Gatsby and his intro is one of the best that I can recall in recent history. If you can get past a couple of the more jarring choices that Baz makes (and aren't a Gatsby / jazz purist), this a solid (if a bit overlong) adaptation.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-16915913663890821642013-05-08T19:57:00.002-04:002013-05-10T10:10:27.438-04:00Theater Interruption (Iron Man 3)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEIVPiTuYkQ" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Iron Man 3 </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Obf08m-A0Iw/UYrmcmffOAI/AAAAAAAAAXM/pTs5PzrU5KQ/s1600/Iron+Man+3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Obf08m-A0Iw/UYrmcmffOAI/AAAAAAAAAXM/pTs5PzrU5KQ/s1600/Iron+Man+3.jpg" height="320" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Shane Black</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Drew Pearce (screenplay), Shane Black (screenplay), and <i></i></div>
<div style="display: inline !important;">
<i><i></i></i></div>
<div style="display: inline !important;">
<i><i><i>Stan Lee, </i></i></i></div>
<i><div style="display: inline !important;">
Don Heck, </div>
</i><i><div style="display: inline !important;">
Larry Lieber, </div>
</i><i><div style="display: inline !important;">
Jack Kirby (comic books)</div>
</i><br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Robert Downey Jr., Gwyneth Paltrow, Don Cheadle</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
Iron Man 3 represents a significant step up in quality from the middle child of the series, but it still can't quite live up to the quality of the original. This franchise entry is a mixed bag of elements that work fairly well and a couple of aspects that have been pretty badly botched. The humor and action are well executed and definitely satisfying - in fact, I was extremely impressed that they managed to pull of a kid as a comic sidekick without completely tanking the film. So kudos on that score. The handful of sequences where Iron Man is actually in his suit are pretty awesome, but are too few and far between. Overall, the execution is great and the main problems are due to a mediocre script, which suffers from some pretty severe inconsistencies with the rest of the Iron Man mythos, logical gaps in the plot, a throwaway PTSD subplot and an eye-roller of an ending. It's still a great way to waste a couple hours and watching RDJ do his thing is as entertaining as always.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 6 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-44070658411345378242013-05-01T23:24:00.000-04:002013-05-01T23:24:21.029-04:00Theater Interruption (Oblivion)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmIIgE7eSak" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Oblivion </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sN9T4Nxij8w/UYHcG6G-InI/AAAAAAAAAW8/vpgpbsuR40w/s1600/Oblivion.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-sN9T4Nxij8w/UYHcG6G-InI/AAAAAAAAAW8/vpgpbsuR40w/s320/Oblivion.jpg" width="218" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Joseph Kosinski</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Michael DeBruyn (screenplay), Joseph Kosinski (graphic novel original story) and Karl Gajdusek (screenplay)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, Olga Kurylenko</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
Kosinski is building himself a decent track record in terms of visual execution as a director with this, his sophomore effort, following up his work in 2010's <i>Tron Legacy</i>. The film is definitely good looking and Tom Cruise is solid, if unspectacular, in the lead. Unfortunately, Morgan Freeman and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau are wasted on weak roles and the script is lacking, to put it lightly. At this point I'm convinced that the title was only recently pared down from the working title of <i>Oblivion: A Copy and Paste Odyssey</i>. By the time we reach the (overly drawn out) second act, it has become a game of "name the original source" for every plot point. With a cobbled together story that lacks anything resembling an emotional core, the only truly engaging part is attempting to spot the telegraphed plot twists before the reveal. Still, it is competently filmed and should satisfy any simple action cravings.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 4 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
PS: I swear we'll get back to the movies on the shelf one of these days.<br />
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-33060079599139113362013-04-10T23:41:00.001-04:002013-04-10T23:41:04.953-04:00Theater Interruption (Evil Dead)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHDJm1D2ELw" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Evil Dead </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iCmLCZ1enD8/UWYwtKGuOOI/AAAAAAAAAWo/eYdOk-Mijnc/s1600/Evil+Dead.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iCmLCZ1enD8/UWYwtKGuOOI/AAAAAAAAAWo/eYdOk-Mijnc/s320/Evil+Dead.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Fede Alvarez</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Fede Alvarez (screenplay), Rodo Sayagues (screenplay), and Sam Raimi (1981 screenplay)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Jane Levy, Shiloh Fernandez, Lou Taylor Pucci</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
In 1981 <i>The Evil Dead</i> erupted from the twisted brain of Sam Raimi - though a cult classic in its own right, the sequels became much more popular in playing up the comedy. <i>The Evil Dead </i>itself was often unintentionally funny, as the intent intent to make a true horror film was countered by the cheapness caused by the shoestring budget. So, here we are, over thirty years later and Sam is finally producing what he originally intended to show us - a straightforward, no-holds-barred horror film. So, how'd the original vision turn out?<br />
<br />
First of all, the film is definitely worse off for not having a charismatic lead along the lines of Bruce's "Ash." To be honest, pretty much all of the characters are really watered-down, to the point where they make even the common horror stereotypes seem interesting. While the plot is still paper-thin, they definitely tried to flesh things out a bit more and provide more of a narrative. To those who are familiar with the series it won't make much difference, but I can imagine it might be appreciated by those going into this thing blind. Where this movie shines is in its dedication to completely over-the-top levels of blood and guts. The unbridled violence and gore is executed to technical perfection and is particularly awesome when much of it is handled without too much CGI. If "blood and guts" isn't your bag, don't bother, this movie has nothing to offer you. For those of you who love some hyperviolence... this is the hardest R-rating I can ever remember seeing and it literally rains blood during the climax. Do it.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 6 / 10</i></b><br />
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-28019059257737153722013-04-04T23:16:00.001-04:002013-04-04T23:16:50.217-04:00Theater Interruption (Stoker)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNpDG4WR_74" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Stoker </span>(2013)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XtFI3tUsidk/UV5B854YMBI/AAAAAAAAAWY/gYhuVhRAt0M/s1600/Stoker.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XtFI3tUsidk/UV5B854YMBI/AAAAAAAAAWY/gYhuVhRAt0M/s320/Stoker.jpg" width="218" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<i></i><br />
<i>Director: Chan-wook Park</i><br />
<i>Writers: Wentworth Miller, Erin Cressida Wilson </i><br />
<i>Stars: Mia Wasikowska, Nicole Kidman, Matthew Goode</i><br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>Stoker</i> is essentially a twisted take on Hitchcock's <i>Shadow of a Doubt.</i> But this isn't Code-era Hollywood here, as Park isn't afraid to crank up the violence and sexual tension to eleven when the story calls for it. Overall, the script is good but not great and really doesn't come together as well as one would hope in the final act, but there is still a lot to love here. Wasikowska, Goode and Kidman are all excellent in their respective roles, but it is Park's direction that really stands out. His use of sound and editing is particularly wonderful in complementing the secluded Gothic aesthetic, producing a tense and oppressive atmosphere throughout much of the film. An excellent Hollywood debut for Park.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 7 / 10</i></b><br />
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-14619330449514338102013-04-02T20:01:00.002-04:002013-06-21T10:48:01.825-04:00Episode Ten (American History X / American Psycho)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV0VEstvjMM" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">American History X </span>(1998)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--3TW6mKQm7g/UVtv-B1KLiI/AAAAAAAAAWA/bEJpIxoAWTs/s1600/American+History+X.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--3TW6mKQm7g/UVtv-B1KLiI/AAAAAAAAAWA/bEJpIxoAWTs/s320/American+History+X.jpg" height="320" width="217" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Tony Kaye</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: David McKenna</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Edward Norton, Edward Furlong, Beverly D'Angelo</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
This film features an incredible performance from Norton and a few scenes that will undoubtedly stick with the viewer. The moments of brutality are particularly memorable and disturbing. Unfortunately, these are in support of a script and director that handle the film's themes with the subtlety and finesse of a jackhammer. There are several moments where the editing and music are trying so hard to make you realize the importance of what is happening that it ends up becoming unintentionally hilarious. A solid, though deeply flawed film. Oh, and Edward Furlong should never be allowed to do voice over, ever... <i>ever.</i><br />
<i><br /></i><i><b>Score: 5 / 10</b></i><br />
<i><b><br /></b></i><i><b><br /></b></i><i><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YnGhW4UEhc" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">American Psycho </span>(2000)</a></b></i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HnsxT2pDN38/UVtwBp86yiI/AAAAAAAAAWI/GwQ-QD4c6mA/s1600/American+Psycho.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-HnsxT2pDN38/UVtwBp86yiI/AAAAAAAAAWI/GwQ-QD4c6mA/s320/American+Psycho.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a></div>
<i><b><br /></b></i>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Mary Harron</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Bret Easton Ellis (novel), Mary Harron (screenplay) and Guinevere Turner (screenplay)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Christian Bale, Justin Theroux, Josh Lucas</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
The premiere "How To" guide for fitting in with upper-class society when all you really want to do is stab them to death and play around with their blood. While the film is endlessly quotable and deliciously dark, the main satirical thrust of the film is a bit too heavy-handed for my taste. The black comedy / horror elements hold up fairly well throughout, but much of the Wall Street excess message drags it down overall. Bale is so wonderfully campy as Patrick Bateman, the titular psycho with an insatiable bloodlust, that his over-the-top performance absolutely carries the film. Definitely not for everyone, but if you don't mind your humor being delivered in the form of an axe to the skull, you may just come to love this.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-9569775458716692982013-03-26T21:22:00.002-04:002013-06-21T10:47:23.121-04:00Episode Nine (Amélie / American Beauty)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JodKDrNgEVM" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Amélie </span>(2001)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7ba4JBDC41w/UVJIvaXtkZI/AAAAAAAAAVo/rbGXF2cLIcw/s1600/Amelie.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7ba4JBDC41w/UVJIvaXtkZI/AAAAAAAAAVo/rbGXF2cLIcw/s320/Amelie.jpg" height="320" width="215" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Jean-Pierre Jeunet</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Guillaume Laurant (scenario), Jean-Pierre Jeunet (scenario), and </div>
<div style="display: inline !important;">
Guillaume Laurant<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"></span>(dialogue)</div>
<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Audrey Tautou, Mathieu Kassovitz, Rufus</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
It most likely won't have you rolling on the floor while clutching your sides, it probably won't bring tears to your eyes and it certainly won't leave you pondering its message and meaning. This film's aims are much smaller - desiring only to bring you a chuckle and a fuzzy feeling in your heart, and at this it surely succeeds. Sweet and stylish, exuding warmth and charm in every facet of its production, from the music to the acting and from the story to the cinematography. Show me the person who can sit through this without cracking a smile and I'll show you the perfect casting for the 347,843rd version of Ebenezer Scrooge.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2n1RkIDqmM" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">American Beauty </span>(1999)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BKKCFTHDOLw/UVJJxwJhQaI/AAAAAAAAAVw/P7QRnruPLr4/s1600/American+Beauty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BKKCFTHDOLw/UVJJxwJhQaI/AAAAAAAAAVw/P7QRnruPLr4/s320/American+Beauty.jpg" height="320" width="216" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Sam Mendes</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: Alan Ball</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Kevin Spacey, Annette Bening, Thora Birch</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
Throughout the film I sense that we're teetering on the brink and one false move will send the entire thing crashing in on itself and failing utterly. Whether or not the film crosses that line is up for debate, but I feel it stays upright (though just barely). The main problem is that the characters in this black comedy / satire are written (mostly) as one-dimensional stereotypes and played as "phony" by the actors. Going in either direction is fine, but doubling up on the "phony" factor puts you dangerously close to unintentional self-parody at times. That said, Spacey is incredible to watch going through the ultimate mid-life crisis and Mendes directs like a seasoned pro in his debut.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 7 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-81021175222147325162013-03-21T21:31:00.001-04:002013-06-21T10:47:09.898-04:00Episode Eight (All About Eve / Almost Famous)<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHVYTPFgCqE" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">All About Eve </span>(1950)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VgsyGjVjruE/UUuvPNmD4oI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/c7xOi_2ePRo/s1600/All+About+Eve.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VgsyGjVjruE/UUuvPNmD4oI/AAAAAAAAAVQ/c7xOi_2ePRo/s320/All+About+Eve.jpg" height="320" width="204" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Joseph L. Mankiewicz</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: Joseph L. Mankiewicz (screenplay)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Bette Davis, Anne Baxter, George Sanders</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
If not the single greatest script of all time, <i>All About Eve</i> certainly earns itself a spot in that conversation. Featuring a solid story with stellar dialogue, the film plays out as a nearly constant exchange of verbal barbs, which makes for great drama and humor. Some might accuse the dialogue of being a little too perfect and witty, thereby stripping the characters and situations of their reality. However, considering the nature of these characters as actors and writers (along with the simple fact that it is so much fun to watch), I'm entirely willing to disregard that particular complaint. Fantastic performances all around - especially from Bette Davis whose turn as an aging star is probably the best of her career. Plus, the mere presence of George Sanders in a film will automatically boost its score by at least a point in my book. Absolutely amazing movie.<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b>Score: 10 / 10</b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0XnyrENrE" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Almost Famous </span>(2000)</a></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4VbleE5jZxA/UUuvwPeJxaI/AAAAAAAAAVY/Rg54BUM197E/s1600/Almost+Famous.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-4VbleE5jZxA/UUuvwPeJxaI/AAAAAAAAAVY/Rg54BUM197E/s320/Almost+Famous.jpg" height="320" width="215" /></a></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<br />
<i>Director: Cameron Crowe</i><br />
<i>Writer: Cameron Crowe</i><br />
<i>Stars: Billy Crudup, Frances McDormand, Kate Hudson</i><br />
<i><br /></i>The film plays best when it is going for funny and heartwarming - the times when it goes for drama are the times where it starts to fall flat. I don't particularly care for Fugit in the central role - in fact, I'd almost rather remove his character altogether and just follow the band, except that this would mean we wouldn't get to enjoy McDormand playing the eccentric, overprotective mom, who is a definite highlight of the film for me. Guess I'm just going to have to deal. Hudson and the soundtrack are phenomenal and the film does a great job of recreating the feeling of the period in which is is set. Oh, and that "Tiny Dancer" scene is indeed great.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 6 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-33609133402534210252013-03-20T22:44:00.001-04:002013-06-21T10:46:58.652-04:00Episode Seven (Alien / Aliens)We're back to the DVD / Blu-Ray collection for the time being.<br />
<b><br /></b><b><br /></b><b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjLamj-b0I8" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Alien </span>(1979)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3MsmsJEbdWw/UUpzBFZ8xGI/AAAAAAAAAU4/dw3iF9G-p_k/s1600/Alien.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3MsmsJEbdWw/UUpzBFZ8xGI/AAAAAAAAAU4/dw3iF9G-p_k/s320/Alien.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Ridley Scott</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: Dan O'Bannon (story and screenplay), and Ronald Shusett (story)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Sigourney Weaver, Tom Skerritt, John Hurt</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
Awesome mixture of horror and sc-fi. The art direction and overall atmosphere are absolutely top notch. I know that people debate back and forth whether Alien or Aliens is better, but I have to give the edge to the original. I think it is all about the setting, in the sequel they have to escape to the ship - in this one, there may be fewer villains but there is nowhere to escape to. Feels so much more tense and claustrophobic knowing that the menace must be dealt with directly. And has there ever been a more menacing creature designed for the screen than the xenomorph? Setting aside the fact that the franchise has been ridden into the ground by now, the original concept is still brilliant.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b><br />
<b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><br /></i></b><b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKSQmYUaIyE" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Aliens </span>(1986)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dSHIEykLEH0/UUpzEtLPiSI/AAAAAAAAAVA/gFjt0Rkbgzc/s1600/Aliens.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dSHIEykLEH0/UUpzEtLPiSI/AAAAAAAAAVA/gFjt0Rkbgzc/s320/Aliens.jpg" height="320" width="211" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: James Cameron</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writers: James Cameron (story and screenplay), David Giler (story), Walter Hill (story)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Sigourney Weaver, Michael Biehn, Carrie Henn</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
Barely falls short of the original, but is still great in its own right. More of the same would have been a bad idea (especially considering how perfectly it was executed during the first go 'round), but anything other than the original concept doesn't play quite as well. A catch-22 to be sure. Nonetheless, Cameron manages to keep things very entertaining with this more "action-y" take on the material. Fun side characters, highly quotable, solid action... pass the popcorn, man.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 9 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-19045913736261346422013-03-19T19:54:00.002-04:002013-06-21T10:46:44.920-04:00Episode Six-Point-Five: James Franco Edition (127 Hours / Oz the Great and Powerful)Today, we've got a Blu-Ray that got added to the collection after we were already past its location as well as a new(ish) theater release. But hey, they star the same actor so we can totally lump them in together. Cool? Cool.<br />
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlhLOWTnVoQ" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">127 Hours </span>(2010)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wAS5DRqt6mQ/UUj47Dp4VDI/AAAAAAAAAUg/ub-_6sr_LQk/s1600/127+Hours.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-wAS5DRqt6mQ/UUj47Dp4VDI/AAAAAAAAAUg/ub-_6sr_LQk/s320/127+Hours.jpg" height="320" width="225" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b><i></i><i>Director: Danny Boyle</i><br />
<i>Writers: Danny Boyle (screenplay), Simon Beaufoy (screenplay), and Aron Ralston (book)</i><br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: James Franco, Amber Tamblyn, Kate Mara</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
A lot of criticism has been directed at Boyle's hyperactive direction and editing, but I feel that it is fairly effective here. While a slower pace and a more somber atmosphere could have made for a more intense experience throughout, I feel that the higher tempo kept things from dragging (which could have easily happened in a story that focuses primarily on a single man in a single location). The first two thirds of the film still might not engage everyone, but when the story turns to "do or die" desperation in the final act it really shines - taking you from cringing horror to watery-eyed triumph. Franco is great in this and the journey is totally worth the climactic conclusion.<br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b>Score: 6 / 10</b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NdeuYgRoTI" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Oz the Great and Powerful </span>(2013)</a></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KF6zshBWvDU/UUj6BbjqqJI/AAAAAAAAAUo/DF_hBnAYUPg/s1600/Oz+the+Great+and+Powerful.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-KF6zshBWvDU/UUj6BbjqqJI/AAAAAAAAAUo/DF_hBnAYUPg/s320/Oz+the+Great+and+Powerful.jpg" height="320" width="216" /></a></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
</div>
<i>Director: Sam Raimi</i><br />
<i>Writers: Mitchell Kapner (screenplay), David Lindsay-Abaire (screenplay), and L. Frank Baum (novel)</i><br />
<i>Stars: James Franco, Michelle Williams, Rachel Weisz, Mila Kunis</i><br />
<br />
Despite the beautiful scenery and fantastic creatures, Oz is a land devoid of much magic or charm. Finley, China Girl and Knuck are charmless, weak substitutes for the original trio of sidekicks. This leaves the success or failure of the film squarely on the shoulders of the Wizard and the Witches - and while Franco is tolerable as Oscar and Williams and Weisz play their weakly-written roles well, Kunis is woefully miscast. Given Raimi's prior films, I was looking forward to his Wicked Witch, but it fell way, way short for a variety of reasons. The film seems stuck somewhere between taking itself seriously and going into full "camp" mode - either of which would have been better than the limbo we ended up with. Major letdown.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 3 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-55313091439052405612013-03-14T20:39:00.003-04:002013-06-21T10:45:08.748-04:00Theater Interruption (Mama / Side Effects)<i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2nwknMmvdc" target="_blank"><b style="font-size: x-large;">Mama </b><b>(2013)</b></a></i><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IKwTwsAA0Y4/UUJsPTULmtI/AAAAAAAAAUI/FG1sES-KcpU/s1600/Mama.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-IKwTwsAA0Y4/UUJsPTULmtI/AAAAAAAAAUI/FG1sES-KcpU/s320/Mama.jpg" height="320" width="215" /></a></div>
<div>
<i><b><br /></b></i></div>
<div>
<i><div>
Director: Andrés Muschietti</div>
<div>
Writers: Neil Cross (screenplay), Andrés Muschietti (story and screenplay), and <i>Barbara Muschietti (story and screenplay)</i></div>
</i><br />
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Jessica Chastain, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Megan Charpentier</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
If there's anything that totally derails the film, it is its uneven storytelling; the first and final acts are more of a dark fairy tale, with emphasis on character, theme and atmosphere. Meanwhile, the middle act is a typical ghost story, overly reliant on jump scares and easily the weakest segment. I also have to say that Jessica Chastain looks way out of place here. However, I absolutely loved the creature design - both in sound and visual style. The feral children are definitely unsettling as well. The story was never anything great, but worked well enough when it took on the more fairytale-esque tone.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i>Score: 4 / 10</i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jQq6BiT-eI" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">Side Effects </span>(2013)</a></i></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EU-QowX5jqU/UUJsT9pKUSI/AAAAAAAAAUQ/V_D_QVKB_2k/s1600/Side+Effects.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EU-QowX5jqU/UUJsT9pKUSI/AAAAAAAAAUQ/V_D_QVKB_2k/s320/Side+Effects.jpg" height="320" width="216" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><br /></i></b></div>
<div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Director: Steven Soderbergh</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Writer: Scott Z. Burns (screenplay)</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
Stars: Rooney Mara, Channing Tatum, Jude Law</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div>
A modern-day Hitchcock that does a wonderful job of keeping the audience on their toes, but may go a bit overboard on some of the plot twists in the later stages of the story. It really does feel like two different films and I would have liked to see more of the first half's atmosphere carried over into the second, but both are very good in their own ways. If this turns out to be Soderbergh's last film, at least it is a significant step up from "Contagion." Mara and Law are fantastic and make up for the abysmal work by Zeta-Jones and the 6'1" void that Channing Tatum leaves on screen.</div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font-style: italic;">
<b>Score: 6 / 10</b></div>
</div>
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-27241736610904677892013-03-06T22:56:00.002-05:002013-03-06T22:56:43.420-05:00Stay Tuned<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-at01QiH4UTA/UTgPkA2Ss3I/AAAAAAAAAT4/Cqe4NdpzQ9A/s1600/Please+Stand+By.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="300" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-at01QiH4UTA/UTgPkA2Ss3I/AAAAAAAAAT4/Cqe4NdpzQ9A/s400/Please+Stand+By.jpg" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
We'll be returning to our "journey to the end of the shelves" on the 13th. So don't touch that dial! (And explain to me how you are navigating the internet with a dial...)Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-91351698003857043722013-02-25T23:03:00.000-05:002013-06-21T10:44:39.549-04:002012 Oscar Recap / ReviewSo, the Oscars happened - let's take a look at what they got right and what left us scratching our collective heads. I won't be commenting on the short / documentary / foreign categories, simply because I haven't had the opportunity to see all of the nominees in those categories yet. But all of the feature categories are up for judgement, so let's get started.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Visual Effects</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AEhbkTeGeo0/USwsWDZEUdI/AAAAAAAAARU/Yj9_xjmw_VQ/s1600/Life+of+Pi.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AEhbkTeGeo0/USwsWDZEUdI/AAAAAAAAARU/Yj9_xjmw_VQ/s200/Life+of+Pi.jpg" height="111" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<b>Who Won: </b><i>Life of Pi</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Life of Pi</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Nailed It</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Richard Parker, the CGI tiger that Pi shares the screen with for most of the film, is beautiful, terrifying and downright <i>real</i>. Add that to the impressive work during the shipwreck and all of the other gorgeous visuals that were created in post-production and this is truly a no-brainer. Good start.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><i>Best Sound Editing</i></span></b></div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GLq3izLxaZU/USwsx0zfBFI/AAAAAAAAARc/G82SIow6pRs/s1600/Skyfall.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GLq3izLxaZU/USwsx0zfBFI/AAAAAAAAARc/G82SIow6pRs/s200/Skyfall.jpg" height="83" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Who Won: </b><i>Skyfall and Zero Dark Thirty (TIE)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Skyfall</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Cheap</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
I mean, really? A tie? You'd think they'd have some sort of procedure in order to keep this from happening, but I guess that isn't the case. They got this one half right, anyway. Skyfall is where it is at - just watch the subway scene again and you'll see what I mean.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<div>
<b><i><span style="font-size: large;">Best Sound Mixing</span></i></b></div>
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C1_jOf9wHsk/USwtDkiIYoI/AAAAAAAAARk/mh6snAIKFOA/s1600/Sinister.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-C1_jOf9wHsk/USwtDkiIYoI/AAAAAAAAARk/mh6snAIKFOA/s200/Sinister.jpg" height="123" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></i></b></div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Les Misérables</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Sinister</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>BZZZZZT! Wrong</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Pretty sure everybody who voted here just heard "recorded live on set" and penciled <i>Les Mis </i>in, no matter what. However, the un-nominated <i>Sinister </i>should have taken home the prize on this one. The atmosphere was thick, due in no small part to the audio mix featuring some great drone artists and wonderful work by the sound team. But, of course, the Academy would never give an Oscar to a simple horror film.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><i>Best Original Song</i></span></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--8awBjSduic/USwtkjHpDbI/AAAAAAAAARs/cmJ8ZwUhhYk/s1600/Skyfall+-+Adele.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--8awBjSduic/USwtkjHpDbI/AAAAAAAAARs/cmJ8ZwUhhYk/s200/Skyfall+-+Adele.jpeg" height="200" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><span style="font-size: large;"><i><br /></i></span></b></div>
<div>
<b>Who Won: </b><i>"Skyfall" - Adele and Paul Epworth</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>"Skyfall" - </i><i>Adele and Paul Epworth</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Layup</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
One of the easiest predictions of the night, "Skyfall" was by far the best of the nominated songs. I agree completely with this one - I only wish that <i>Snow White and the Huntsman </i>would have gotten some love here for "Breath of Life" from Florence + The Machine. It certainly could have replaced "Before My Time" on the nomination list.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Original Score</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2E_tRLQa-Xw/USwt1mpbeoI/AAAAAAAAAR0/4NBSFI-NvnE/s1600/The+Master.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2E_tRLQa-Xw/USwt1mpbeoI/AAAAAAAAAR0/4NBSFI-NvnE/s200/The+Master.jpg" height="176" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won:</span><i> </i><i>Mychael Danna (Life of Pi)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Jonny Greenwood (The Master)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Oops</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
The fact that Greenwood's perfect score wasn't even nominated was an absolute joke and the nomination list was really weak as a whole. Nominating <i>Lincoln,</i> <i>Argo </i>and <i>Anna Karenina </i>instead of the superior choices in <i>The Master</i>, <i>Beasts of the Southern Wild</i> and <i>Cloud Atlas</i>. The Academy really lost their way here, though at least they gave the award to a score that was worthy of being nominated.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Makeup and Hairstyling</i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ioeyvdmkZnE/USwuCHIZevI/AAAAAAAAAR8/0iXzxP8YB4I/s1600/The+Hobbit.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ioeyvdmkZnE/USwuCHIZevI/AAAAAAAAAR8/0iXzxP8YB4I/s200/The+Hobbit.jpg" height="111" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Les Misérables</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Reeeeaaaallly?</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Freakin' dwarves, man! I would have assumed that this was a gimme, but I guess they really liked the aged Valjean? Gave me a good chuckle.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Costume Design</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UgUGJvzNm7k/USwuWHwXsAI/AAAAAAAAASE/1ixZ2SgKfF8/s1600/Anna+Karenina.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UgUGJvzNm7k/USwuWHwXsAI/AAAAAAAAASE/1ixZ2SgKfF8/s200/Anna+Karenina.jpg" height="133" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Jacqueline Durran (</i><i>Anna Karenina)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Jacqueline Durran (</i><i>Anna Karenina)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Sure, why not?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
Unless something comes completely out of left field, this is basically a gimme category for the most well regarded period piece of the year. Nothing else caught my eye, so <i>Anna Karenina </i>it is.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Production Design</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9_XoUHtPawQ/USwu1b_ZptI/AAAAAAAAASM/J7TydD5Yfyc/s1600/The+Hobbit+Rivendell.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9_XoUHtPawQ/USwu1b_ZptI/AAAAAAAAASM/J7TydD5Yfyc/s200/The+Hobbit+Rivendell.jpg" height="86" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Lincoln</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Reasonable</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
The production value of <i>Lincoln</i> was obviously top-notch, so I can't really complain about this selection. I'm simply far more impressed by projects that successfully bring to life a world that never actually existed, rather than recreating the past (unless it is recreated on a massive scale). As it stands, I would have given the award to <i>The Hobbit </i>and considered recognizing <i>Looper </i>here for its near-future aesthetic, which was subtle but effective. </div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Editing</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-N3jLBOUZric/USwvNTopgoI/AAAAAAAAASU/5FPcubEdqDQ/s1600/Zero+Dark+Thirty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-N3jLBOUZric/USwvNTopgoI/AAAAAAAAASU/5FPcubEdqDQ/s200/Zero+Dark+Thirty.jpg" height="112" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>William Goldenberg (</i><i>Argo)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>William Goldenberg and Dylan Tichenor (Zero Dark Thirty)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Solid selection</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div>
Goldenberg is getting a statue in either case, I guess I just wanted to be a bit more generous and hand out a second one. To be honest, I'm perfectly happy with both of these. I simply think that the final act of <i>Zero Dark Thirty </i>leans more heavily on the strength of its editor than <i>Argo</i>'s final act does and based my decision on that - both are top notch choices. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Cinematography</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gVZgLwR6fEQ/USwvf6Bj2gI/AAAAAAAAASc/y3MjRntuzuU/s1600/Skyfall+Skyscraper.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gVZgLwR6fEQ/USwvf6Bj2gI/AAAAAAAAASc/y3MjRntuzuU/s200/Skyfall+Skyscraper.jpg" height="112" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Claudio Miranda (</i><i>Life of Pi)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Roger Deakins (Skyfall)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Sorry, try again</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Don't get me wrong, Life of Pi looks great. But an award for Cinematography should be awarded based on skill in capturing images on film, not creating them in post-production. Look at Bond's fight in the Shanghai skyscraper, shot in silhouette, amidst reflective glass walls and backlit by massive neon lights. Then look me in the eye and tell me that wasn't the most impressively shot piece of film in 2012 - and then I'll proceed to tell you that you don't know what you are talking about and should go home, you're drunk. Following Deakins my pick would have been Mihai Malaimare Jr. for his work on The Master, which was not even nominated.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b><i><span style="font-size: large;">Best Animated Feature Film</span></i></b></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XZ2_Jn9AqYg/USwv6JLXrjI/AAAAAAAAASk/qUNQUv-ff2s/s1600/ParaNorman.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-XZ2_Jn9AqYg/USwv6JLXrjI/AAAAAAAAASk/qUNQUv-ff2s/s200/ParaNorman.jpg" height="112" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<b><i><span style="font-size: large;"><br /></span></i></b></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Brave</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>ParaNorman</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Did they even watch them?</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<i>Brave </i>was the third best of the nominees, if I am being generous. Bland and uninspired, it was one of the weakest films that Pixar has released to date. It doesn't come close to matching the concept and charm of <i>Wreck-It Ralph</i> which, in turn, is weaker than <i>ParaNorman - </i>your real winner. As my verdict states, I'm wondering how many people simply checked the "Pixar" box on this one. A brand name buys you statuettes, it seems. </div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Adapted Screenplay</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lgPWHWplisI/USwwFRtqvGI/AAAAAAAAASs/OcRZnxsxEjg/s1600/Argo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lgPWHWplisI/USwwFRtqvGI/AAAAAAAAASs/OcRZnxsxEjg/s200/Argo.jpg" height="125" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Chris Terrio (</i><i>Argo)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Chris Terrio (</i><i>Argo)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Yes</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
I almost handed this one to Kushner for the <i>Lincoln </i>screenplay, since it was an impressive feat to keep that kind of dialogue-heavy, political drama interesting for that length - but then I remembered the extreme cheese that made up the prologue and epilogue of that film and went with my next pick, which was <i>Argo. </i></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"Argo **** yourself!"</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Original Screenplay</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tOOmBkDcrBc/USwwhDBGj-I/AAAAAAAAAS0/TjH_Yz7FcqM/s1600/Django+Unchained.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tOOmBkDcrBc/USwwhDBGj-I/AAAAAAAAAS0/TjH_Yz7FcqM/s200/Django+Unchained.jpg" height="118" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Quentin Tarantino (</i><i>Django Unchained)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Quentin Tarantino (</i><i>Django Unchained)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>They got one right, anyway</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<i>Seven Psychopaths,</i> <i>Ruby Sparks </i>and <i>Looper </i>really deserved nods here instead of <i>Amour</i>, <i>Flight </i>and <i>Zero Dark Thirty. </i>But at least they got the top spot right. <i>Django </i>does a damn good job of balancing drama, humor and action with some amazing exchanges of dialogue throughout. An extremely easy choice from that nominee list - I think my version is a much stronger sampling.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>Best Director</b></i></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BQWs7rEBYL4/USwwvcWxwqI/AAAAAAAAAS8/R7Ryajnwym8/s1600/Moonrise+Kingdom.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BQWs7rEBYL4/USwwvcWxwqI/AAAAAAAAAS8/R7Ryajnwym8/s200/Moonrise+Kingdom.jpg" height="111" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><i><b><br /></b></i></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Ang Lee (Life of Pi)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Wes Anderson (Moonrise Kingdom)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>FUBAR</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
This is the one category that was jacked up by the time the nominations were announced. Ang Lee was the right choice out of the nominees, but the Academy completely whiffed on their nominations. A list of nominees that included the truly superior directorial efforts of the year would have featured: Wes Anderson, Quentin Tarantino (<i>Django Unchained</i>), Paul Thomas Anderson (<i>The Master</i>), Ben Affleck (<i>Argo</i>) and Kathryn Bigelow (<i>Zero Dark Thirty</i>). The Academy really screwed the pooch with this one.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Supporting Actress</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-oWyJSk_BKeA/USwxQGtK1ZI/AAAAAAAAATE/1JLCA5ADlAk/s1600/Snow+White+and+the+Huntsman.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-oWyJSk_BKeA/USwxQGtK1ZI/AAAAAAAAATE/1JLCA5ADlAk/s200/Snow+White+and+the+Huntsman.jpeg" height="121" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Anne Hathaway (</i><i>Les Misérables)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Charlize Theron (Snow White and the Huntsman)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict:</b> Predictable</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Pretty sure everybody gave up on this category as soon as that teaser trailer came out with Anne singing "I Dreamed a Dream," but I'm not about to give <i>Les Mis</i> the satisfaction of being able to put "Oscar Winner" on the Blu-Ray case. No, instead I'm giving the award to the most entertaining scenery-chewing villain since Gary Oldman in <i>The Fifth Element</i>. Sure, it is a bad movie, but Theron single-handedly makes it entertaining every time she is on screen.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Supporting Actor</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6_vmjJL4p1M/USwxg2PphPI/AAAAAAAAATM/SluScd92zig/s1600/Django+Unchained+Leo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6_vmjJL4p1M/USwxg2PphPI/AAAAAAAAATM/SluScd92zig/s200/Django+Unchained+Leo.jpg" height="105" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Christoph Waltz (Django Unchained)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Leonardo DiCaprio (Django Unchained)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Toughest choice, by far</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
If I could give this award to Leonardo L. Waltz-Jackson for his/their work in <i>Django</i>, I absolutely would. As it stands, I would have given this one to Leo, though all three are absolutely deserving. This is truly the most competitive category, as Hoffman and Tommy Lee Jones are both worthy of a statuette as well and it is very tough for me not to award a five-way tie. Loved all of those performances.</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Actress</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LvBx7F53lBM/USwx3Hbfe8I/AAAAAAAAATU/AUxJ4mJGkpU/s1600/Silver+Linings+Playbook.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LvBx7F53lBM/USwx3Hbfe8I/AAAAAAAAATU/AUxJ4mJGkpU/s200/Silver+Linings+Playbook.jpg" height="121" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Jennifer Lawrence (Silver Linings Playbook)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Bullseye</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
What to say here? It was a two-horse race between Emmanuelle Riva and Jennifer Lawrence - and my choice was Lawrence by a hair. </div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Actor</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZNDexP3uJm4/USwyk-PcPnI/AAAAAAAAATk/QIXByucwpuQ/s1600/The+Master+Scene.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZNDexP3uJm4/USwyk-PcPnI/AAAAAAAAATk/QIXByucwpuQ/s200/The+Master+Scene.jpg" height="106" width="200" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Daniel Day-Lewis (Lincoln)</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Joaquin Phoenix (The Master)</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Admiral Obvious</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Let's be perfectly honest, this one was a lock from the moment it was announced that DDL would be playing Abe. I have nothing against this pick, because both of these performances were absolutely brilliant. I found Pheonix's raw energy as Freddy Quell a bit more engaging than the more relaxed and sedate role of Lincoln, but that's pure personal preference. Daniel Day-Lewis bein' a boss, setting Academy records and giving the best speech of the night is totally fine with me.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i>Best Picture</i></b></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-76537pLDr8M/UO40EWF7blI/AAAAAAAAAJM/cyxIc1HeeFg/s1600/Django+Unchained.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-76537pLDr8M/UO40EWF7blI/AAAAAAAAAJM/cyxIc1HeeFg/s200/Django+Unchained.jpg" height="200" width="134" /></a></div>
<div>
<span style="font-size: large;"><b><i><br /></i></b></span></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Who Won: </span><i>Argo</i></div>
<div>
<i><br /></i></div>
<div>
<b>Who Should Have Won: </b><i>Django Unchained</i></div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Verdict: </b>Acceptable</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
Argo wasn't the best film of the year, but it was the second-best out of the nominees. So, while I wouldn't have voted for it, I've no quarrel with those that did. The worst part of this category was that it included <i>Les Misérables,</i> rather than any number of the far superior films that didn't get the recognition that they deserved (eg. <i>Skyfall</i>, <i>The Master</i>, <i>Moonrise Kingdom</i>, <i>Looper</i>, etc.).</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
So, there you have it. They did right by a lot of categories, but when they missed... it was often by a long shot.</div>
Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5321501060125836866.post-8523225458996766152013-02-21T23:03:00.000-05:002013-06-21T10:44:24.878-04:002012 Catch Up (End of Watch / The Sessions)<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX2CO4YyREU" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">End of Watch </span>(2012)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BTj4hjquRzU/USbstjyL0cI/AAAAAAAAAQ4/G7j7orJtEA8/s1600/End+of+Watch.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-BTj4hjquRzU/USbstjyL0cI/AAAAAAAAAQ4/G7j7orJtEA8/s320/End+of+Watch.jpg" height="320" width="207" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b><i></i>
<i>Director: David Ayer</i><br />
<i>Writer: David Ayer</i><br />
<i>Stars: Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Peña, Anna Kendrick</i><br />
<br />
<br />
This is one of those times when a single facet of a film is able to carry the rest of the project. Because, if I'm totally honest, while I've got a hell of a lot of complaints about the movie, I still had fun watching. So, let's start with the bad: found footage - why introduce this element? It leads to nonsense like having a gang film its own drive-by shooting and they use plenty of unexplained camera angles anyway, so what's the point? Speaking of the gangs, the scenes that focus on them are cringe-worthy - I'd call them cartoonishly evil, but I've yet to see a cartoon where over half the dialogue is expletives. Add these things to the fact that the story is nothing to speak of and you appear to have a recipe for disaster. But this is where our leads come in; despite the unbelievable situations and weak narrative, the performances by Gyllenhaal and Pe<br />
<div style="display: inline !important;">
ñ</div>
a are superb and the chemistry between them as real as it gets. They make you care about the characters and thus draw you into these intense situations, even when your suspension of disbelief is strained to the breaking point. Exciting and touching, despite its many flaws.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 6 / 10</i></b><br />
<br />
<b><i><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy2y7UIpgP4" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;">The Sessions </span>(2012)</a></i></b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-62WxfCWotgM/USbtSJwTzZI/AAAAAAAAARA/Gcw7vDcuX2I/s1600/Sessions,+The.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-62WxfCWotgM/USbtSJwTzZI/AAAAAAAAARA/Gcw7vDcuX2I/s320/Sessions,+The.jpg" height="320" width="213" /></a></div>
<b><i><br /></i></b><i></i>
<i>Director: Ben Lewin</i><br />
<i>Writers: Ben Lewin (screenplay), Mark O'Brien (article)</i><br />
<i>Stars: John Hawkes, Helen Hunt, William H. Macy</i><br />
<br />
<br />
"The Sessions" doesn't seem to be sure whether it wants to be heartwarming, heartbreaking or hilarious. I'm certainly not saying that you can't do all of the above, but here the combination just seems too diluted. Jokes are cracked just as things are about to get "too serious" and when things seem to be staying light-hearted we get a dose of melodrama. Shifting tones like this requires time to explore each of these areas, as well as a deft hand from its screenwriter. At a mere 95 minutes, this film touches on a lot of subjects but lacks depth when it come to most of these themes. Therefore, even when emotional punches do actually land, there seems to be very little weight behind them. The film is certainly not bad, with Hawkes, Macy and Hunt all turning in Oscar-caliber performances. They are able to carry this material a long way and make you care for these people, even where the script seems like it could have used a bit more fleshing-out.<br />
<br />
<b><i>Score: 5 / 10</i></b>Schmittyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14833178861583395318noreply@blogger.com0